GCSE English Coursework: The Crucible Essay -- Essay on The Crucible

GCSE English Coursework The CrucibleThe Crucible.Arthur Miller, The Crucible is a play found upon the events ofcapital of Oregon, Massachusetts in 1692. The story is about a religiouslymotivated town. The story is about a group of girls who are led byAbigail, who satanic witchcraft for their troubles. Being a strictChristian family the people of Salem believed in the girls stories.In conclusion this led into 20 people macrocosm falsely accused, and hung.The girls stories were easy to believe because of many reasons. Salemtown was filled in a Puritanism belief. Everything they did was for immortal they were doing Gods work. With this they believed that thebible was the ultimate answer to any question. When something wentwrong they would automatically look into the bible and the teachingsof God and anything it said they would abbey to it.John Proctor is accused of being a witch when he forgets his 10commandments. He forgets to mention about not committing adultery.Proctor replies t o this by saying, I think it may be a small fault,with Hale replying, Theology, sir, is a fortress no crack in afortress may be accounted small. Because they lived in a society thatwas strict and suspicious about everything because they were paranoidwith fear. Hale suggests that because has forgot to mention adulterythat Proctor doesnt see it as a problem and lead commit adultery.The people of Salem would swiftly blame the devil as when somethingbad or evil would happen. Towards the beginning of Act One we see thiswhen Betty fall sick and Mrs Putnam says, Id not call it sick theDevils touch is heavier than sick, this shows us what a stronglyreligious society Salem was at this time. This makes the ... ...he liked her power. She likes to be in control.The society has a strong pride. With the people of Salem notconfessing to the witchcraft. Because they didnt admit they assumedthat they did do the witchcraft, so the girls stories were easy tobelieve even more so.In conclusion the gi rls stories were easy to be believed because thesociety of Salem was an extremely religious. They were paranoid withfear, which made them venerable to small things causing superstition.Another reason why the girls stories were easy to believe was becausepeople treasured to believe them so they could end old grudges and claimland.People were scared to question the Bible because they would be accusedof doing the Devils work and indeed hung. The Religious views aboutChristianity were taken too literally and as a punishment over 20people were hung because of it.

My College Experience :: Personal Narrative Writing

My College ExperienceMy decision to change schools from The University of North Texas to come to Penn State, leaving behind friends I had made was a difficult and long process. The months leading to the decision were filled with a lot of stress, and put strain on family and friends alike. Adding to the situation was the strain of my non having a car, and not being able to afford to fix my current one. Even with these factors pressuring me, I think I managed to make the right decision, and left UNT, and came to Penn State.I should have cognize right from the start that I would have problems. My first day on the UNT campus I was told I would have to redo nearly all of my previous college work. They had diametrical history, language, and English requirements than did my community college from Pennsylvania, and despite providing course descriptions, the classes that did match up, were named differently that theirs, so they denied transferring nearly all of my classes. After a fight, I resolved to take the classes that they involve differently from my community college, for example, American History, where I had European history. Things were not fixed yet, but at least I was taking classes, and making progress.To further aggravate things, I fell ill not a week into the semester. An initial strain of the flu had me running a fever of 102, and made me pretty more unable to do anything. I managed to get over it in about a week, but then I got a secondary infection which erst again raised my body temperature to 102+. I finally went to see a doctor. He explained what happened why my fever broke and came back. He also prescribed antibiotics and cough medicine which got me on my feet again after another week. When I came back, professors were not willing to work with me at all, doctors note or no doctors note. My physics class even had a test the first day I was back, and I was forced to take it totally unprepared. uncalled-for to say I failed the test miserably. To my surprise, so did the rest of the class. I managed to catch up in all my other classes to the pointwhere I could expect a C, but I never recovered from physics, and ended up needing toretake it, and having my GPA smudged.

My College Experience :: Personal Narrative Writing

My College ExperienceMy decision to change schools from The University of North Texas to come to Penn State, leaving behind friends I had made was a difficult and long process. The months leading to the decision were filled with a lot of stress, and put strain on family and friends alike. Adding to the situation was the strain of my non having a car, and not being able to afford to fix my current one. Even with these factors pressuring me, I think I managed to make the right decision, and left UNT, and came to Penn State.I should have cognise right from the start that I would have problems. My first day on the UNT campus I was told I would have to redo nearly all of my previous college work. They had several(predicate) history, language, and English requirements than did my community college from Pennsylvania, and despite providing course descriptions, the classes that did match up, were named differently that theirs, so they denied transferring nearly all of my classes. After a f ight, I resolved to take the classes that they required differently from my community college, for example, American History, where I had European history. Things were not fixed yet, but at least I was taking classes, and making progress.To further turn down things, I fell ill not a week into the semester. An initial strain of the flu had me running a fever of 102, and made me pretty some(prenominal) unable to do anything. I managed to get over it in about a week, but then I got a secondary infection which in one case again raised my body temperature to 102+. I finally went to see a doctor. He explained what happened why my fever broke and came back. He also prescribed antibiotics and cough up medicine which got me on my feet again after another week. When I came back, professors were not willing to work with me at all, doctors note or no doctors note. My physics class even had a test the first day I was back, and I was forced to take it totally unprepared. uncalled-for to say I failed the test miserably. To my surprise, so did the rest of the class. I managed to catch up in all my other classes to the pointwhere I could expect a C, but I never recovered from physics, and ended up needing toretake it, and having my GPA smudged.

Globalization: the Americanization of the World?

Andrew J. Bacevich, the Statesn Empire The Realities and Consequences of U. S. Diplomacy (Harvard University Press, 2002). Joseph E. Stiglitz, Making Globalization Work (Norton, 2007). throng L. Watson, ed. , Golden Arches East McDonalds in East Asia (2nd edition, Stanford University Press, 2007). Robert McCrum, Globish How the English Language Became the Worlds Language (Norton, 2010). F beed Zakaria, The Post-the Statesn World (Norton, 2009). Globalization is the integration of the worlds different regions into a global culture, economy, geo- governmental arena, and communication ne twork.It is the process by which the lines of nation states are blurred, smoothed over by immature inter issue institutions. Globalization is the inevit commensurate destination of human history and as such permeates nearly every facet of it. It is liquid in this sense, flowing and changing to fill in wheresoever it flows, entirely there stool be no doubts of the tide of globalisations source The join States of the States. At first glance, the distinctions between Globalization and Americanization are almost imperceptible. well-favoured Mac, Coke, and Disney (Watson, 5) are as recognizable to Chinese and Russians as they are to Americans.The World Bank and IMFs policies are more(prenominal) or little set by Washington. The American military has the most stiff armies and fleets the world has ever seen, and has effectively dominated the world from World War I onwards. The unify States population which is less than 5% of the world population produces approximately a quarter of global gross domestic product. Such realities top executive lead one to the conclusion that Globalization and Americanization are synonymous, besides is this actually the case? In the discussion of the books at hand, globalisation as it pertains to Americanization is made evident.Andrew Bacevich contends that the unite States is the primary agent of forward-looking globalization. It has capital ized on the opportunities it has been presented with in nightspot to create a system of global politics and economics that is of the most bene volley to itself, all the while packaging it in altruistic rhetoric. Joseph Stiglitz contends that the United States has conducted globalization by dominating the institutions of world governance and finance. It has dresse so to the detriment of other(a) nations and as such, the American means of globalization is not the best strategy if true globalization is the desired end. James Watson holds that McDonalds, once as iconic of America as the stars and stripes and one of the leading agents of globalization, has been assimilated into many local cultures. As such, it no longer represents the modifyd aspect of globalization, however is rather an inter field institution and an agent of globalization at large. Yet, some of the seemingly obvious aspects of American conduct globalization are not as American as they may seem today.Robert McCru m offers that English being the worlds language a plagiarizes not from American economic and foreign policies, but is rather a legacy of the British Empire. Furthermore, that America is not spreading its culture through English, it is only a rotating shaft to be used for communication. Finally, Fareed Zakaria demonstrates that we are departing from a unipolar world dominated by America. Although it will continue to play a leading role in the globalization of the world, the rise of the rest is diminishing its role and the United States is no longer solely holding the reins of globalization.Andrew Bacevichs assertion is that the idea of the American pudding stone differs only in form from traditional imperialism. Its function, enriching the mother country, is precisely the same but employs a variety of techniques to guess this less evident. The United States embraces its role in history of exerting power only as a last resort. Only when circumstances totally necessitated it would America resort to using Theodore Roosevelts proverbial orotund stick (Bacevich 117).The Spanish American war began only when General Valeriano Butcher Weyler could be tolerated no more. World War I was entered only because of the unprovoked German aggression upon the Lusitania. Cold War military and political endeavors were nobly pursued to defend against Communist aggression. Yet Andrew Bacevich rejects this view. He argues that this myth of the slow superpowerAmericans assert themselves only under duress and then al manners for the noblest purposes (Bacevich 7-8) is exactly that, a myth.That Roosevelts reportedly soft speaking and big stick carrying America uses the reluctant superpower myth only in order to justify acts of self-interest. Perhaps the more fitting description of America by Theodore Roosevelt is his affirmation that of course, our whole national history has been one of expansion (Bacevich, 7). The United States has conscientiously exerted itself at every opportuni ty in order to expand its global economic and strategic interests. Americas superpower status and role as an agent of globalization is driven entirely by the machinery of self-interest.Bacevich writes that ever increasing prosperity (Bacevich, 85) is the primary national interest. Furthermore, as Bill Clinton stated Growth at home depends upon growth abroad. Of course, there is still the legitimate idealistic side of globalization as the last promise of peace, prosperity, and democracy (Bacevich, 42), but Americas actual interest and role in globalization is to expand the American economy. In other words, Americas aims in globalization are to benefit the world yes, but benefit the United States most of all (Bacevich, 96).The American economic empire, brought about by the domestic desire for continued growth is the overarching American interest in the realm of globalization. The item that where interests were slight, the United States seldom bothered to make the effort to assert a ny substantial leverage (Bacevich, 107) vividly illustrates this. Considering the insubstantial economic incentives of Africa, it consistently ranks dead last in U. S. strategic priorities (Bacevich, 107). Now, take into account the economic and political incentives of Europes markets and the Middle Easts oil reserves.Based on US military intervention, it is telling that conditions that in the Balkans or the Persian disconnectedness the United States found intolerable were in Africa only unfortunate (Bacevich, 108). The United States found it necessary to militarily intervene in the former two interest-rife locations, and merely sent aid and rhetorical sympathies to the economically barren latter. The portrait of Americanization and Globalization that Andrew Bacevich paints acknowledges one of the primary facets upon which the two collide, the global economy and the United States role indoors it.To deny that America has been the driving force behind the creation and continuance o f modern open market operations, and to deny that it has done so for the betterment of its consume economic interests is to deny all but the rhetoric of American imperialism. The United States did not have, as the historian Ernest May naively stated, greatness thrust upon it (Bacevich, 7), but rather calculatedly and ingeniously shaped its responses to global politics and economics in order to integrate and derive the most benefit from the new globalized economy.Joseph Stiglitz, rather explicitly argues that globalization should not mean the Americanization of either economic policy or culture, but it often doesand that has caused resentment (Stiglitz, 9). He argues that the worry about American unilateralism, about the worlds most powerful country imposing its will on others (Stiglitz, 5) is fast becoming substantiated. Despite economic indicators such as GDP suggesting that poor countries seem to be improving, globalization might be creating rich countries with poor people (Stigl itz, 9).As Stiglitz argues, the United States goal of making Americanization a grammatical constituent of globalization is causing this. Particularly responsible has been the Washington Consensus, a set of development promoting policies created between the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the World Bank, and the U. S. Treasury. The former two of these are basically international lending bodies, delivering short and long term loans, respectively, to countries in need.The policies outlined are downscaling of government, deregulation, and rapid liberalization and privatization (Stiglitz, 17). Although these are the characteristics of westbound countries, western countries did not become this way through the shock therapy of instant implementation. quite an they came from a drawn out progression of events The implication is that the United States, in attempting to make its political and economic policies integral concepts of the grander one of globalization, is actually turning cou ntries off to the Americanized aspect of globalization.Similarly, the manner in which the United States encourages international trade to be conducted is a hindrance to globalization at large within poor countries. Stiglitz writes that countries often need time to develop in order to compete with foreign companies (Stiglitz, 70). Yet, The United States and the international trade organizations which it dominates oppose tariffs for many industries on the grounds of it inhibiting trade and not allowing the all-wise power of the market to control the economy.However, most successful countries did in fact develop behind protectionist barriers and climbed the ladder of development. The anti-tariff policies that soundly developed countries advocate are viewed as trying to kick the ladder away so others cant follow (Stiglitz, 71). The uncertain effectiveness of these western policies, policies necessary for developing countries to get assistance from the IMF and World Bank, which they almo st undeniably need, calls into question the western policies which they dont necessarily need, namely democracy.Stiglitz writes that IMF conditionality undermines democracy (Stiglitz, 56), that although globalization has helped spread the idea of democracy, it has, paradoxically, been managed in a way that undermines democratic processes within countries (Stiglitz, 12). America, in efforts to save countries from disbursal time on the economic policy learning curve, in reality ends up harming them. As such, the United States inadequacy for creating economic agendas for developing countries is a paradox of its own success.He posits that in order for the developing countries to benefit from globalization, the agenda of globalization needs to depart from the Americanized version, and instead have the voices of developing nations (be) heard more clearly (Stiglitz, 98). If the hardline factors of globalizationeconomics, geo-political military assertions, and international governance are the easiest to assess the American-ness ofthe soft aspects cultural and linguistic patterns, are the most difficult.James Watson contends that in some respect, global corporations gain their transnational appeal simply by being American by being an image of modernity. However, he to a fault holds that components of globalization that were once considered agents of Americanization are now accepted as local. Japanese McDonalds have clearly capitalized on the fact that it is associated with American culture (Watson, 172). In China, McDonalds promotes the corporations image as an exemplar of modernity (Watson, 42).McDonalds in these countries represents what the West represents, or more accurately, what the locals believe the West to representthe promise of modernization (Watson, 41). It has asleep(p) so far as to even change cultural eating habits. In these locations, McDonalds sells more than hamburgers. It sells America as an ideology, a place of modernity, cleanliness, efficiency, and equality. As Watson would contend in China and Japan, McDonalds represents the convergence of the idealistic facets of Americanization and globalization the United States as a favorable model to be emulated.Yet in the case of McDonalds in Hong Kong, it is not considered an example of American-inspired transnational culture or perceived as an exotic or alien institution (Watson, 107). Rather it is a fully assimilated part of Hong Kongs modern culture. As Watson writes, the transnational is the local. The younger generation could not imagine life without it (Watson, 109). Thusly, at least in Hong Kong, the American aspect of McDonalds globalization has faded with its assimilation into the national identity element. Although American, it no longer Americanizes or suggests that the American odel is something good and unique that should be followed. McDonalds in Korea however suggests a different view of Americanization. Some people hold that eating McDonalds hamburgers is tantamo unt to treason and loss of Korean identity (Watson, 158) At least here, to some degree McDonalds is viewed as an American crusader of cultural imperialisma new form of exploitation that results from the export of hot culture from the United States (Watson, 5). McDonalds represents a conquering American agent seeking to enthrall and draw in cultures to that of its global Americanized one.Another phenomenon of globalization, one might argue American-driven globalization, is English becoming the language of the world. Robert McCrum argues however that this is not a legacy of the American century, but rather a legacy of the British Empire. America has helped to propagate it but it in fact is originally an agent of British-ization. McCrum writes The nineteenth (century) was, supremely, the century of British English first the Kings and then the tabbys but it alike witnessed the beginnings of the worlds English (McCrum, 174).English spread to the earth not as a result of Americas dom inance in the 20th century, but rather Britains far flung immigration in the 19th. McCrum contends that this is what made Jean-Paul Nerrieres global English (Globish) so neighborly to so many people across the world. It is removed from American influence in that it was not asserted upon the world by America. Rather because of Britain and certain historical tilts towards English speaking, it simply fell into place.In essence, McCrum asserts that British English lay the foundation for English to become, as John Adams wrote in 1780, in the next and win centuriesthe language of the world (McCrum, 105), and as such is not truly an assertion of American influence. However, McCrums points are debatable. As a proud Englishman, he seems alert to assert the obvious role of Britain in making it a global language, but is less generous when it comes to the American aspects. Furthermore, his denial of English as a cultural force is problematic. The global media is dominated by America.The lar gest media conglomerates in the world are American. Ten of the highest twelve paid musicians in the world are American. McCrum seems to veer the fact that media is one of the largest aspects of globalization, and that American influences dominate it. These have been the themes of globalization. The convergence of Americanization and globalization has dually permeated military affairs, economics, culture, and language. On the global stage, the United States has been the dominant player for over a century. However, to what extent will this remain true in the 21st century?Fareed Zakaria contends that it will, but will consider a reassessment of the global community. Zakaria puts forth that we are now living through the third great power shift of the modern era (Zakaria, 2), not the decline of America but ratherthe rise of everyone else (Zakaria, 1). What this means for Globalization as it is linked to Americanization is that although the U. S. s role will still be there, it is dimini shing. The historically United States dominated past has paved the way for this. Its active efforts in globalizing the worlds consequence is the rise of the rest (Zakaria, 2).As Zakaria writes the United States succeeded in its great and historic missionit globalized the world. But along the wayit forgot to globalize itself (Zakaria, 48). The arising international order that Zakaria sees is a term invented by Samuel Huntington uni-multipolarity, which can be described as many powers and one super-power (Zakaria, 43). In the new international order, the United States will merely be a leading actor on a stage of many. The other actors are comprised of new powerful economiesChina, India, Brazil.The United States has been able to maintain its preeminence within globalization in the past but the changing realities of the global economic landscape will require according change from America. Zakaria lays out a series of principles that the United States should or must follow in order to ma intain its position in the modern world as a chief agent of globalization. These principles recognize the changing landscape and suggest how America can perpetuate its interests, its goal of Americanization within globalization. Firstly, the United States must choose which policies it actively wants to pursue.The ambiguity of policy facing Iran and North Korea do not allow the United States to reach an attainable international goal. If the United States were to decide that they were simply proponents of regime change or policy change (that is, denuclearization) (Zakaria, 234) they could more efficiently define the changes they wish to see in the global community. Similarly, in order for the US to continue to blend Americanization with Globalization, they must set out broad rules and seek to cultivate its bilateral relationships with other nations.As Zakaria argues, if the U. S. has strong relationships with other strong nations, better than anyone has with another, it gives the Unit ed States the greatest leveragemaximizing its ability to shape a peaceful and stable world (Zakaria, 242). The United States must also be careful in how it shapes its responses to international conflict. Legitimacy is power (Zakaria, 247) and the nature of the United States current conflicts are asymmetrical, meaning they are not facing conventional military forces or typical state actors.As Zakaria writes asymmetrical responses have become easier to execute and difficult to defeat (Zakaria, 244). Therefore in order to remain legitimate, to have the power to set the agenda, define a crisis, and mobilize support (Zakaria, 247) for the United States interests in globalization, reactions need to be shaped to fit the conflicts at hand. Overall, Zakaria contends that if the United States is not willing to change its policies and approach towards globalization and the global community, it will no longer effectively be able to appointment Americanization with globalization.In the analysis of how linked globalization and Americanization are within the context of these books, a complex and comprehensive picture can be draw. The United States has been able to use globalization as a tool to create a global economic empire and cultural model. Through the capitalization of opportunities to expand its markets, package in its reluctant superpower myth, the United States has been able to assert itself internationally and accomplish its political and economic aims.However, the changing nature of the global landscape calls for a recalculation of how this strategy of self-interest can be perpetuated. Furthermore, the United States will have to make some concessions regarding its hegemony as other nations with large populations and strong economies grow in power and importance. Culturally, the United States benefited from the British Empires legacy of spreading English around the world. However, it has also been able to capitalize on this and further Americanize the world throu gh the consequentially large English speaking media outlets.Multinational corporations such as McDonalds still possess their American identity abroad, but this is beginning to change in respect to the worlds youth. It is now dually perceived as a symbol of modernity (which sometimes equates to Americanization) but also a component of local culture. Therefore, whether globalization is the Americanization of the world seems to be a yes. The debate whether it will, or should continue to be, is still ongoing, and remains to be seen, dependent on how America conducts itself in the post-American World.

Case Study on Operational Management Essay

Confession during my dating youth, no matter how more I liked a girl, no matter how much I wanted her and just her exclusively, Id never key her that purely for fear of looking weak and pathetic. If we were ever to instill beyond the vague, undecl atomic number 18d status that characterizes every birth in its early phase, well, that would be up to her. Most quats think this authority.The problem with this strategy is that sometimes, a guy likes a woman so much that hed rather not wait for her to initiate The Talk. Or, if youre like me, youre over 30 and generally cranky and impatient, so youd like to know where things stand before too many months of amorphous pseudo-commitment go by. The challenge is to share your feelings in a way that will help you get what you want and wont make you seem like youre groveling and/or heroic. present are some tips to keep in mind.Never just assume youre exclusiveThis should seem obvious, but guys can still be forward and make all kinds of emb arrassing mistakes. I was seeing this girl and I changed my Facebook profile to say In a Relationship, admits PJ. And she was like, Who are you in a family with? I was like, You I could tell she wasnt exactly happy about it. The lesson You have to get her to say yes to the idea of dating exclusively before you are in fact dating exclusively. This brings us to our next piece of advice Browse Local Singles at Match.com on YahooI am aSeeking aNearMake sure theres a good chance shell say yesThe conventional wisdom is that women are ever so ready to have a boyfriend. And maybe that was true during the Eisenhower administration. But in the present day of Facebook and the near limitless possibilities of online dating, it is just as likely a woman wants to have what is euphemistically known as having fun. Be really careful if shes just finished a long-term relationship, says James, a chef. Or if she doesnt return your phone calls right away. If your calls are going right to voicemail, and she doesnt call you back for like eight hours, she doesnt want you to be her boyfriend.Dont go overboardThe guiding principle in asking a girl to be your girlfriend is to not appear desperate No matter how good your intentions, you may never recover from it. My boyfriend bought me a necklace and literally got on his knees and asked me to be his girlfriend, says Shelia, a web designer. I state yes, but it was a little much. Even less dramatic overtures can still feel over the top.I was at dinner with this girl, and I took her arrive at and said You know Im not seeing anyone else, says Zach, a lawyer. I thought wed have this romantic moment, but she just looked at me like I was crazy.Bring it up casuallyGiven that overboard gestures might make a woman uncomfortable, consider doing what most men do best anyway asking in a more laid-back manner. Make sure the venue in which youre asking is mellow as well no fancy dinners, no propositions in front of family, and so on. Remember You wa nt to be in the kind of circumstances where her saying no wont leave you feeling like a dolt for an extended period of time. I think while youre walking her pedestal or driving her home is good, says Eric. That way youre not stuck at some restaurant with this giant rejection hanging over you if she says no.So how should you cough out it up? A simple Hey, Ive been wondering whether we should date each other exclusively. What do you think? should work just fine. It reveals your intentions, and yet leaves the door way open for her to say no thanks, shes not ready for that yet. Another natural segue is if introductions will soon be in order say, shes meeting your friends and youre wondering if you can say shes your girlfriend. Or consider my friend Rebeccas story for around six weeks, shed been dating this guy who was on break from grad school. Then one weekend he was about to leave to go back to school, she recalls. And right before he left he said, By the way, when I tell my friend s about you, can I call you my girlfriend? I loved thatConsider ending the relationship if she says no This is a good idea for two reasons. First, theres nothing sadder than hanging around a girl who wants you a whole throne less than you want her. Remember high school, when you were in love with the girl who only wanted you as a friend? Well, its worse, since youre get enough relationship crumbs from the table to keep you involved, but not so few that youre moving on with your life and trying to meet soulfulness new. Second, by moving to end the relationship, you force her to consider life without you and she has to decide if thats doable for her. Women are stereotypically the ones who use this tactic Marry me or Im out of here We need to settle down or I need to move on, etc. And the only time we realize how much we love and need them is when theyre out the door.So learn from women. If youve done everything else right youve asked her casually, youve made sure all the signs tha t she likes are there, and she still says no tell her I think youre great, but Im interested in something more serious. You might leave with a heart that heals fairly quickly. Or you might get a call from her within a week or two, asking if when she tells her friends about you, she can call you her boyfriend.Steve Hamilton is a New York City-based freelance(a) writer.

Robert Frost: Lessons of Life

Robert ice Lessons of Life Robert Frost has over fifty poems circulating throughout the world. Frosts public life can be separated between flashes of insight and deeper wisdom. Individuality, passionateness, religion, and nature be all things that can be learned from Frost. His mental, emotional, and spiritual equipment all blend together to form poems which can teach people things about their own life. Love can be learned from Robert Frosts poetry. Frosts poem, waver, is a representation of love becoming a positive force. It teaches how things from the heart are irrational, alone people cannot be reluctant to how they respond to these feelings.There is wrinkle of realistic affirmation that accepts the challenge for the human conditions (Isaacs 42). Love should dominate all to Frost. In the conclusion of Wild Grapes, love is the theme that dominates the attitude towards life. All of my poems are love poems, Frost said (Thompson 185). Love is the strongest expression of forces . There are different levels which suggest the types of love. In A Prayer in Spring, in that location is specific emphasis on the present. There are no problems about the future and what comes after death. It ends with an emphasis on the need to fulfill actions controlled by love (Thompson 189).Nature is something that any integrity can learn from every single day. Frost uses references to nature in almost all of his poems. In Once by the Pacific, Frost speaks of water and woods. The water is representational of power and how much the water eats away at the woods and the cliffs. This can be translated into many things, but one idea is that God is the water. He is the power. volume are the woods and cliffs. God constantly is eating away at people. He wants us to follow Him. A lesson that can be learned from this is to follow and trust in Him and His ways.In Desert Places, nature is used to illustrate the thoughts and feelings of the speaker. The entire poem takes place foreign on a dark, snowy night. Nothing can be seen. The speaker is alone and upset that the animals can go and escape from their everyday lives. He fears the aloneness of life. The fear is not of the places that the bleakness will take him but of the anguish that will take place in his mind. This teaches how to overcome difficult situations. It shows how to defeat extend and worry in everyday situations. The mind is one of the most dangerous things and Frosts poetry can help focus in on what is truly mportant so that one stays focus in his or her goals and plans. Throughout Frosts works, there are references to a higher God. People can learn about God and His power through Frosts poems about creation and design. In Acquainted with the Night, he uses images of loneliness in the night, however, the speaker indicates his spiritual tormenting as he overlooks his physical anxieties. People have to learn that they must overcome what is of themselves and focus on that which is of God. With Stoppi ng by Woods on a Snowy Evening, there are images of a need for spiritual investment.Reason is not enough in life, but faith can bring a compromise between the two so that they can work together to create a harmonious lifestyle. In Design, there is a focus on a creator. It opens mans thinking to go beyond reason and look at the looking of faith (Isaacs). Another idea is hope. Frost plays a lot of importance on staying hopeful in life. In Peril of Hope, there is the ideal that no matter how things are at one minute in time, they can always change. Nothing is ever promised, but everything can be hoped for in the future. Hope is constantly there and will always be there.It is endless. Hope can be found anytime and any place. There are no limitations on it. This teaches that one should always have hope. Situations can always change for the better at any time. Works Cited Isaacs, Elizabeth. An Introduction to Robert Frost. New York City Haskell House, 1972. On The passageway Not Taken Welcome to English Department of English, College of LAS, University of Illinois. 10 Apr. 2010. http//www. english. illinois. edu/maps/poets/a_f/frost/road. htm. Thompson, Lawrance. Fire and Ice The Art and Thought of Robert Frost. New York City Russell & Russell, 1961.

Aging Bill in PA

This course study will dwell on the subject of the House Bill 1935 in Pennsylvania, how it came to be and the contributing factors that necessitated its emergence as a bill of rights for the time-honored. Likewise, this study shall review other(a) related studies and find the current approaches and support mechanism it receives from various government datencies and representatives.IntroductionAs an important factor in the withstands of every individual, a roof over ones head is a basic need that is a vital necessity to life. For many, it offers a stamp of security that can be a bulwark against fear of homelessness, institutionalization, and isolation (Comijs, et al, 1998886).The older individuals in PA need an ideal laboratory to age in place considering that elderly household represents 31% of the nations 1.1M public lodgment households (Dolon and Blakely, 198931). It is understood that elderly individuals consider the home as a form of security that guards them against cont umely and invasion which is an indispensable factor in their retirement years.Throughout the 1960s, older Americans with lower income were accommodated through large number of developments that built traditional apartments. Public lodging did not originally target older Americans at all (US-HR 1981).This was considered adequate for the majority of low-income older residents although this housing program does not provide the flexibility to allow residents to age in place, nor does it necessarily provide the range of housing options needed to serve the increasing sh ar of frail seniors (US Natl Center for Assisted Living, 2001) (Pifer and Bronte, 1986).More recently though, the elderly resident population is changing radically, bringing new challenges to public housing providers (Kassner, 2005). Undeniably, the increasing adult population be not only poorer, they are similarly older and a disproportionate minority and female, and more likely to be alone (US Natl Center for Assisted Living, 2001).These population demographics are increasing and as baby boomers age, the US government and the housing authorities will be faced with problems of providing appropriate and adequate facilities for them. The increasing need of frail seniors therefore unavoidably to extend public housing as a large federal program offering housing assistance to low-income elders (US Natl Center for Assisted Living, 2001).Several shimmy studies embarked on the successful developments planned by housing authorities to address the needs of their rapidly aging populations. Efforts were offered as a supportive mechanism for housing authorities to adopt new approaches in order to meet the needs of their elderly tenants (Pifer and Bronte 1986).Some program of development were even dismissed and simply declared as ill-equipped to meet the residential and supportive service needs of their increasingly frail and diverse residents (Pifer and Bronte 1986). Without such acceptable run, the governm ent is faced with an alternative of abject senior citizens into costly, isolated institutions (Schwartz, 2000).This remedy though was seen as giving a devastating effect that might develop into unnecessary institutionalization of elderly persons which was later considered outlying(prenominal) more costly than those offered in other settings.Public housing authorities across the country were then trying to find innovative ways to serve these tenants and are building partnerships with nonprofit organizations and with the state and local service providers.They tried finding new ways to raise capital for modernization and development, creating models that can guide other housing authorities grappling with similar situations (Schwartz, D.C. (2000).In answer, the Pennsylvania Housing Finance Agency in collaboration with the Department of Aging and the Department of Public benefit under PA Bill 1935 aimed to provide appropriate housing and care needed by frail elderly and other benefits of enhanced senior services (HB 1935).The development of HB 1935Existing programs in the face of huge budget cuts have recognized the need to meet the shelter and service needs of the growing elderly population. This growing population is consisting of adult individuals well into the eighties and nineties who need a physically supportive environment that will sustain their needs.The government is shortly faced with the pressing need to bring services to the existing developments that can no longer provide nor suit their frail physical condition.Faced with looming budget problems, several(prenominal) programs were stalled that ultimately empower the federal government to reassess the needs of the elderly individuals by fielding service coordinators to the assisted housing complexes across the country.Assumptions made by government authorities endorsed the idea that senior citizens who are growing frail will have to move to a different housing continuum as a housing option. Basicall y as older couples are sooner separated by illness or death, older individuals are also asked to transfer to wholeness family homes, apartments, congregate living, assisted living and board and care homes (Brenton, 1983).Equally though, frail people are moved into nursing homes that vary according to their availability and affordability. Under this notion, housing options are differentiated by the types of services generally offered which includes the supportiveness of the setting in terms of accessibility features and design and competence of the persons to whom the housing is targeted (Holshouser, 1988).The response gathered by service coordinators however created a differing view which recognized the fact that frail, older persons do not necessarily have to move from one setting to other if they need assistance which has often resulted to health problems for them(US,APA2002)(US-HR1981).Studies were soon allowed to create a feasibility haven for dependent or dependent older pers ons who can live in a variety of settings, including their own homes and apartments, if the physical environment is made more supportive, caregivers are available to provide assistance and affordable services are accessible (Haber and Gratton, 1993).